Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with a general score of 77.4 against 76.2. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is a a lot newer device, and it's also a little bit lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a more recent 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, giving a lot of extra features.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a very superior CPU than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little bit better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with more screen brightness and a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a much higher video definition. Galaxy A15 5G features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A15 5G has a little better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.