Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than Galaxy A15 5G, with a overall score of 97.6 against 77.4. The Galaxy Fold is an extremely older and heavier cellphone than Galaxy A15 5G, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. The Galaxy Fold features a much greater performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold features a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A15 5G features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.