Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than the Galaxy A15 5G, getting an 87.7 score against 77.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy M51's body is way older, just a bit heavier and thicker than Galaxy A15 5G.
Galaxy A15 5G features a little more vivid display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy A15 5G has a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A15 5G also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy M51 also has more RAM. Galaxy M51 shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M51 also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy M51 features a much better battery performance than Galaxy A15 5G, because it has a 40% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.