Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Galaxy A15 5G, getting a score of 79.3 against 77.4. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 5 is an incredibly older cellphone than the Galaxy A15 5G, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat lighter and just a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it has 7 less CPU cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 5 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A15 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture for better low-light images.
Although Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.