Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having a overall score of 88.3 against 77.4. Galaxy S10 is an notably older phone than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but it is a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy S10 features a lot better performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a better pixel quantity per inch of display.
Galaxy A15 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features just a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 is way more expensive than the Galaxy A15 5G, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.