Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Galaxy A15 5G, with a score of 98 against 77.4. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is noticeably older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Galaxy A15 5G. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because it has a greater screen pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bit larger screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a really superior performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera with a much higher resolution and a way higher video definition. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to the Galaxy A15 5G one, both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and the same 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is just as good as the Galaxy A15 5G one.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.