Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is much better than Galaxy A15 5G's overall score of 77.4. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 is older than the Galaxy A15 5G, it's construction is lighter and a bit thinner.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a little bit higher pixels amount per inch of display and much more brightness. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A15 5G counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a way higher video resolution.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S22, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.