Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the Galaxy A15 5G, with a global score of 95.4 against 77.4. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better cellphone than the Galaxy A15 5G, we must highlight that it is also older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because it has a better count of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger screen, way more brightness and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher resolution camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery life is very similar to the battery lifetime in Galaxy A15 5G.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A15 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.