Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 general score. Galaxy S7 is an notably older device than the Galaxy A15 5G, but Samsung managed to build it incredibly lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Galaxy S7 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy S7 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite more brightness, a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy A15 5G takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.