Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy A15 5G's score of 77.4. Galaxy S9 is a lighter device than the Galaxy A15 5G, but they are 0.33inches thick. Galaxy S9 counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S9 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.