Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 general score. Galaxy XCover Pro's design is a lot older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little inferior pixels amount per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 50 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Galaxy A15 5G, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.