Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Galaxy A15 5G, having a general score of 94.6 against 77.4. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a way older and extremely heavier phone than Galaxy A15 5G, but Samsung managed to make it thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A15 5G has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Galaxy A15 5G count with quite similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.