Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G, having an 81.1 score against 77.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a way older, just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than the Galaxy A15 5G. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Galaxy A15 5G has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A15 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro have quite similar batteries, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.