Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a bit better than Galaxy A15's score of 73.5. The Google Pixel 3 is a noticeably lighter and just a little bit thinner device than Galaxy A15. The Google Pixel 3 features a really superior performance than Galaxy A15, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A15 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count in each inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger display. Galaxy A15 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A15 features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% larger battery size. Google Pixel 3 captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A15, although it has a camera in the back with a much lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.