Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than Samsung Galaxy A15, having a overall score of 87 against 73.5. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A15. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 has Android 14 version.
The Motorola razr (2020) features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A15. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A15 has just a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite higher pixels density, a little bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Motorola razr (2020) features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A15, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A15, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light images.
The Galaxy A15 counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.