Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Galaxy A15's 73.5 overall score. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Galaxy A15 has Android 14. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is just a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A15.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A15, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A15, because it has a quite greater pixels quantity per inch of display, a quite larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A15, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A15, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A15 counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.