Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Galaxy A15, having a score of 98 against 73.5. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little thicker and just a little heavier phone than Galaxy A15. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Galaxy A15 has Android 14.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A15, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A15, because it has a little larger screen, a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A15, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A15, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A15 and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have quite similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.