Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy A15, with an 87.9 score against 73.5. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a a little thicker and just a bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A15. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A15, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A15, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, and they both have the same display brightness, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite larger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A15, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and Galaxy A15 both count with very similar storage for applications and games, they have equal 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A15 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.