Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than the Galaxy A16 5G's score of 76.2. The iPhone X is a lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy A16 5G. Apple iPhone X has a much better performance than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone X has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a lot darker screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel number per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px. IPhone X shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a way less mega-pixels camera in the back, they both have the same aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a better memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.