Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is much better than the Galaxy A16 5G, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 76.2. The Apple iPhone XS body is just a bit thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A16 5G. The Apple iPhone XS has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a lot more opaque screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The iPhone XS has a much faster processor than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A16 5G features a very superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent greater battery size. IPhone XS captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy iPhone XS, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.