Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A16 5G's overall score of 76.2. HTC One M9 is a extremely lighter but somewhat thicker device than the Galaxy A16 5G. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
HTC One M9 features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit CPU. HTC One M9 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density.
The HTC One M9 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a lot less MP back camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in low light environments. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A16 5G features a way better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 76 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, HTC One M9 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.