Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, with an 81.3 score against 76.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a bit thinner and lighter phone than the Galaxy A16 5G. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit more memory for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A16 5G features a much better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a way lower 16 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.