Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy A16 5G, getting a general score of 81.2 against 76.2. The LG V40 ThinQ is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy A16 5G. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher screen density. The LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior CPU than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A16 5G has a bit more storage to store more apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. LG V40 ThinQ shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a much better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.