Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, having an 81.5 score against 76.2. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Moto G 5G has an older 10 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. Moto G 5G's design is a lot thicker and just a bit heavier than Galaxy A16 5G.
The Moto G 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A16 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
Moto G 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments. Galaxy A16 5G has a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy A16 5G also has 64 GB more internal memory.
Moto G 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy A16 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.