Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Surfing blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, with a overall score of 82.6 against 76.2. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a just a little bit heavier and thicker device than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a little bit lower display pixel density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a display of the same size.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has more internal memory capacity. Moto G 5G Plus features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a lot better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 48 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy A16 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.