Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's overall score of 76.2. Motorola Moto G200 5G is a just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A16 5G features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a just a bit lower display density and a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and Moto G200 5G count with similar battery durations.
Moto G200 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.