Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 230.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A16 5G has a general score of 76.2, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Even being the best we compare here, the Galaxy A16 5G construction is just a little thicker and heavier than the Moto Z Force. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy A16 5G has the previous 14 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto Z Force counts with a screen that's just as good as the screen in Galaxy A16 5G, because although the Moto Z Force has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A16 5G features slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto Z Force shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a much less MP back-facing camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is also cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.