Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, having a 77.6 score against 76.2. The Moto Z3 design is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. These phones work with Android OS, but the Moto Z3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version, so it counts with some extra features and increased performance.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A16 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a bit sharper screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z3 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos and a way worse 12 MP resolution camera. Galaxy A16 5G features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs more than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z3, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.