Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, having an 80 score against 76.2. The Motorola One Zoom construction is a bit lighter but thicker than Galaxy A16 5G. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video. Galaxy A16 5G has greater battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.