Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's general score of 76.2. Motorola razr (2020)'s design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, but it is just a bit lighter. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit larger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 5G. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.