Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Polar night |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 230.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, having an 80.5 score against 76.2. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8.3 5G has 11 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, the Nokia 8.3 5G construction is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy A16 5G.
Galaxy A16 5G has a little more vivid screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit lower pixels density. The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has just a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than Nokia 8.3 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Nokia 8.3 5G features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.