Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's global score of 76.2. The Galaxy A50 construction is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Galaxy A16 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a bit bigger display. The Galaxy A50 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy A50 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.