Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than Galaxy A16 5G, having a 76.9 score against 76.2. Galaxy A70 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A16 5G, but both are equally thin. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A70 has a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A16 5G has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a bit lower pixel quantity in each screen inch and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a screen with the same size.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A16 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.