Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than Galaxy A16 5G, getting a global score of 88.1 against 76.2. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy F62 is a somewhat thicker and just a little heavier device than the Galaxy A16 5G.
Galaxy F62 features an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite worse display pixel density, and they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also counts with much more brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery performance than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a 40 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.