Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 global score. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is noticeably heavier but somewhat thinner than Galaxy A16 5G.
Galaxy Fold has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a much less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light images and video. The Galaxy Fold features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A16 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A16 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A16 5G, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.