Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, having a 90.8 score against 76.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's body is just a bit lighter but a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note 20, although it has a just a bit lower pixels amount in each inch in the display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a same size display.
Galaxy Note 20 has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a way less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same aperture.
The Galaxy A16 5G has much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A16 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A16 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A16 5G, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.