Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's general score of 76.2. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. Even being the best we are comparing, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a higher screen pixels density and a little larger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much more MP back-facing camera. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Galaxy A16 5G count with really similar storage for games and applications, both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and equal 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.