Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 score. Galaxy Note10 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A16 5G, but they are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy Note10 has a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A16 5G has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy A16 5G features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note10 captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.