Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is much better than the Galaxy A16 5G, getting a global score of 94.8 against 76.2. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14. Galaxy S20 is a somewhat lighter device than Galaxy A16 5G, but both of them have the same thickness.
Galaxy S20 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same aperture. The Galaxy S20's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's one, both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A16 5G has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.