Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A16 5G. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, a quite larger screen and more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Galaxy A16 5G one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy A16 5G.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.