Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Galaxy A16 5G, having a 93.4 score against 76.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14. Galaxy S22's construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A16 5G.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count per screen inch and a really brighter screen. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy A16 5G counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35 percent more battery size. Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. They have the same aperture and a camera with a 50 mega-pixels.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S22, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.