Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is way better than Galaxy A16 5G's global score of 76.2. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy S22 Ultra is a thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A16 5G. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a brighter display than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has much more brightness, a quite bigger display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the Galaxy A16 5G one.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.