Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is way thinner and much lighter than Galaxy A16 5G. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better looking screen than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite bigger display, a lot brighter screen and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a battery lifetime that is just as good as Galaxy A16 5G's battery lifetime.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a larger aperture to take better photography in low light situations and a back facing camera with a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.