Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G's general score of 76.2. The Galaxy S7 is a extremely lighter device than Galaxy A16 5G, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit more brightness, more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy A16 5G features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a very superior processor than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has 4 less cpu cores (but faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A16 5G features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S7 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S7 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.