Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, having an 80.1 score against 76.2. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is extremely thicker and incredibly heavier than the Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy A16 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A16 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.