Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, having an 81 score against 76.2. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a a little bit heavier and notably thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A16 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A16 5G, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.