Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Galaxy A16 5G, having a general score of 90.6 against 76.2. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a thinner but heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A16 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A16 5G has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.