Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, with a global score of 82.2 against 76.2. Despite being the best we compare here, Xperia XZ2 Premium is a heavier and notably thicker device than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a way better looking display than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2160 x 3840 resolution, a little brighter display and a way greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.