Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, having a overall score of 82.7 against 76.2. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's body is somewhat thicker but a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A16 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a little bit bigger display and way more brightness.
The Galaxy A16 5G has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A16 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.