Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's global score of 76.2. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size and the same screen brightness, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a quite higher pixel number in each inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better resolution camera. Galaxy A16 5G features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.